The Ashland City Council has unanimously approved an ordinance imposing fees on the installation of fossil-fueled appliances in new residential construction, sparking both support and criticism from various community groups. The measure, supported by youth-led organizations like the Ashland Youth Electrification group, aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by encouraging the use of electric appliances. Fees range from $146 for a clothes dryer to $4,118 for a furnace and the policy will take effect in January 2026.
Proponents argue that this initiative aligns with Ashland’s Climate and Energy Action Plan and will help the city meet its climate goals while promoting cost-effective construction methods. According to supporters, all-electric homes are not only cheaper to build but also save homeowners money on utility bills over time. However, critics, including representatives of the natural gas industry and some local residents, have raised concerns about the potential strain on Ashland’s electrical grid and the added costs for homebuilders.
Revenue generated from these fees will be directed to Ashland’s Low-Income Energy Assistance Program.
Key points about the ordinance include:
- It applies only to new residential construction beginning in 2026.
- Fees are designed to discourage fossil fuel use while preserving consumer choice.
- Electric appliances are promoted as more cost-effective and environmentally friendly.
- The revenue will support programs aiding low-income households with energy costs.
While supporters see the measure as a meaningful step toward reducing local emissions, opponents argue it could increase housing costs in a city already known for high construction expenses. Additionally, concerns remain regarding whether Ashland’s infrastructure is prepared for increased electrification demands.
This decision positions Ashland as the first city in Oregon to impose such fees, potentially setting an example for other municipalities. However, debates over affordability, energy reliability, and infrastructure readiness suggest that further discussions on balancing climate goals with practical concerns are likely to continue.